Subject: Re: [boost] What to do about std::binary_function andstd::unary_function?
From: Nick Matteo (boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-05-07 15:13:18
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Peter Dimov <lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Either one of those would be fine, although I personally would do something
> in-between and only provide result_type for boost::bind, mostly out of
> nostalgia. :-)
Shouldn't boost::bind be updated to use std::result_of instead? (That
is, #ifndef BOOST_NO_CXX11_HDR_FUNCTIONAL from Boost.Config.)
Nick Matteo