Subject: Re: [boost] Question about the weak_ptr constructor with lock() call
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-04-20 14:56:46
Andrey Semashev wrote:
> Maybe the cheaper (and arguably more common) version could be used when it
> is known that the virtual inheritance is not in play?
It's still undefined behavior, even though it would work.