Subject: Re: [boost] ATTENTION: Library requirements..
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-01-07 05:53:04
On 2016-01-07 12:50, Artyom Beilis wrote:
>> f) javescript.
>>
>> I thing the admonitions agains java script should be softened. Most of the
>> concerns existent when the document was originally written don't apply to
>> day.
>> [snip]
>> Robert Ramey
>>
>
> I'm second on that - no javascript requirement should be removed.
> One of the best source code documentation tools around generate
> javascript code to simplify navigation.
>
> I'm talking of course about Doxygen :-)
To the reasons given in the rationale I can add that lots of people
disable JavaScript in browsers (NoScript and similar tools), which would
affect viewing the docs with it.