Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in a Boost.Chrono/Date library
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-10-25 17:03:13
Howard Hinnant wrote:
> I have other authors, and clients who have requested the MIT license, and
> it would be awkward to remove the MIT license at this point. I have no
> objection to the boost license being added to the MIT license on the boost
> distribution though.
This unfortunately can't work because the MIT license is more restrictive
than the Boost's one. As far as I know, of course.
What can work is for you to release the code under a dual license, that is,
the licensee to be able to choose between MIT or Boost at his discretion.