Subject: Re: [boost] [http] Formal review of Boost.Http
From: Ralf Globisch (rglobisch_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-17 06:02:27
> 2. The current CMake support is easier to use for the reviewers who
> want to take the library for a test-drive. Using Boost.Build would
> require that they copy Boost.Http into their Boost source tree. I
> find it unfortunate to force reviewers to "pollute" their Boost
> source tree with candidate libraries.
+1 - strongly agree.
-- This message is subject to the CSIR's copyright terms and conditions, e-mail legal notice, and implemented Open Document Format (ODF) standard. The full disclaimer details can be found at http://www.csir.co.za/disclaimer.html. This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. Please consider the environment before printing this email.