Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.DLL formal review
From: Bjorn Reese (breese_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-07-14 06:37:06
On 07/11/2015 11:50 PM, Antony Polukhin wrote:
>> The design rationale and the FAQ seems to be in disagreement about ABI
>> portability.
>>
>
> Did not get that. At what place do they disagree? ABI != portability.
On what side of that equation does "ABI portability" fit? This may be
the source of the confusion.
As I currently read the documentation, the design rationale leaves the
impression that there is no ABI portability, whereas the FAQ that there
is some (e.g. for aliases.)