Subject: Re: [boost] [Hana] Formal review
From: Zach Laine (whatwasthataddress_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-06-18 09:50:29
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 11:23 PM, Edward Diener <eldiener_at_[hidden]>
wrote:
> I have not reviewed Hana yet but I feel the need to comment about any
> arbitrary number of compilers a library must work under. I completely
> disagree with the notion that any such number would be the cause of
> accepting or not accepting a library as part of Boost. If a library is
> found useful and works according to the latest version of the C++ standard
> that should be more than enough for that library to be accepted into Boost
> as part of the review process pending individual reviews.
>
+1
Zach