Subject: Re: [boost] Deprecation Policy
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-20 18:43:47
Stefan Seefeld wrote:
>>> So, as I'm trying to get back into Boost.Python, I'm considering
>>> decoupling that from the rest of Boost. I think this is an obvious first
>>> candidate, notably because it's a substantial library (not header-only)
>>> that few other Boost components depend on.
...
> I very strongly believe that modularizing Boost will be beneficial for
> everyone. I'm offering to do the first (experimental) steps with
> Boost.Python in the hopes that this demonstrates the usefulness to other
> library authors and maintainers who will then follow the same path.
I'm not sure I understand what you want to do. When you say "decoupling",
what do you mean? Moving to a separate release schedule, or making
Boost.Python not depend on other Boost libraries? What is your plan?