Subject: Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatory Boost libraries
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-15 08:54:18
AMDG
On 05/15/2015 01:59 AM, John Maddock wrote:
>
>> 2. A compile time and binary bloat deficiency, sometimes very
>> substantial.
> Really? Why would the Boost versions be so much larger than the std
> versions? Can you give an example?
>
I'd guess that the issue isn't so much using
one vs. the other as using /both/ in the same
program.
In Christ,
Steven Watanabe