Subject: Re: [boost] Some statistics about the C++ 11/14 mandatory Boost libraries
From: Stephen Kelly (hello_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-05-14 19:27:42
Stephen Kelly wrote:
> I was not being sarcastic.
>
> I haven't seen people on this list face the issue of which libraries have
> maintainers and which do not, although it has been raised repeatedly.
As Niall wrote elsewhere in this thread, addressing the collection of that
information is apparently in progress.
Thanks,
Steve.