Subject: Re: [boost] [boost.ublas] [gsoc'15]
From: David Bellot (david.bellot_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-03-18 09:50:20
>
> overhead that error-codes have), but I think it's an acceptable trade-off
> here, as it's the only way to support disabling exceptions.
>
> What say you?
​apart from the fact it requires implementing a wrapper, which is not a big
deal, it looks like a good solution.
​
​We loose the functional aspect because of passing the error code variable
by reference, but we're not supposed to be that "functional" on error codes
either.​
Sounds good to me.