Subject: Re: [boost] [variant] match()
From: Eelis (eelis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-07 03:54:57
On 2015-01-07 09:41, Eelis wrote:
> I'm not sure its complexity gives that implementation any advantages.
(One difference is that my implementation uses common_type to compute the return type, whereas theirs rejects the call if the return types are not all the same.)