Subject: Re: [boost] Synchronization (RE: [compute] review)
From: Thomas M (firespot71_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-12-29 14:53:57
On 29/12/2014 17:56, Kyle Lutz wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 1:21 AM, Thomas M <firespot71_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> On 29/12/2014 03:23, Kyle Lutz wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Gruenke,Matt <mgruenke_at_[hidden]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Boost [mailto:boost-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Kyle Lutz
>>>> Sent: Sunday, December 28, 2014 20:36
>>>> To: boost_at_[hidden] List
>>>> Subject: Re: [boost] Synchronization (RE: [compute] review)
>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 4:46 PM, Gruenke,Matt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> My understanding, based on comments you've made to other reviewers, is
>>>>>> that functions like boost::compute::transform() are asynchronous when
>>>>>> the result is on the device, but block when the result is on the host.
>>>>>> This is what I'm concerned about. Is it true?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Yes this is correct. In general, algorithms like transform() are
>>>>> asynchronous
>>>>> when the input/output ranges are both on the device and synchronous when
>>>>> one
>>>>> of the ranges is on the host. I'll work on better ways to allow
>>>>> asynchrony in
>>>>> the latter case. One of my current ideas is add asynchronous
>>>>> memory-mapping
>>>>> support to the mapped_view class [1] which can then be used with any of
>>>>> the
>>>>> algorithms in an asynchronous fashion.
>>
>>
>> When you speak of input/output ranges on the host, to what kinds of
>> iterators do you refer to? Any input/output iterator kind (e.g. iterators
>> from a std:: container -> just tried a std::vector on
>> boost::compute::transform, didn't compile if provided as input range), or
>> iterators that are part of your library?
>
> In general, all of the algorithms operate on Boost.Compute iterators
> rather than STL iterators. The main exception to this rule is the
> boost::compute::copy() algorithm which copies between ranges of STL
> iterators on the host and Boost.Compute iterators on the device.
> Anther exception is the boost::compute::sort() algorithm which can
> directly sort ranges of random-access iterators on the host (as long
> as the data is contiguous, e.g. std::vector<T>). I am working to add
> more direct support for host ranges to the other algorithms. Currently
> the best way to use the Boost.Compute algorithms together with host
> memory is with the mapped_view [1] class.
I would find it very helpful to forbid invalid iterators as arguments as
much as possible at compile time. For example I can use a
std::vector::iterator as output range argument:
std::vector<int> stdvec(100, 0);
boost::compute::transform(some_begin(), some_end(), stdvec.begin(), ...);
I guess such a use would be invalid; if transform accepts only iterators
from your library then I suppose such compile-time checks should be
possible for both input and output (including targeted error message).
Thomas