Subject: Re: [boost] [variant] Opinion on boost::safe_get<> and default boost::get<> behavior
From: Rob Stewart (robertstewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-12-09 19:14:53
On December 9, 2014 2:44:32 PM EST, Peter Dimov <lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>my recommendation still stands. Make get<> strict, see what
> happens.
+1
___
Rob
(Sent from my portable computation engine)