Subject: Re: [boost] [optional] operator<(optional<T>, T) -- is it wrong?
From: Rob Stewart (robertstewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-11-26 17:25:47
On November 26, 2014 5:03:44 PM EST, Gottlob Frege <gottlobfrege_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>I'd support dropping op< and only having ==, !=, and
>std::order/std::less.
+1
___
Rob
(Sent from my portable computation engine)