Subject: Re: [boost] [modularization] proposal and poll
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-30 13:04:28
>> This only gives the primary dependencies; it would be nice for the
>> finished product to include the secondary module dependencies as well
>> (without going into specifics what included what, just what module
>> brought up the secondary dependency).
>
> And here's the secondary report on smart_ptr. (My initial version listed
> modules in alphabetical order, not in discovery order, which was even
> more stunning as I hadn't the faintest idea why all these modules were
> deemed a dependency.)
A lot of those look like testing dependencies rather than header-usage
dependencies?
John.