Subject: Re: [boost] [modularization] proposal and poll
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-30 08:31:25
Glen Fernandes wrote:
> It would be nice if both approaches (static configuration, automatic
> identification) take into account - or allow you to specify - conditional
> dependencies (e.g. dependencies based on identification of supported or
> unsupported features determined by Boost.Config).
It would be nice, but is it implementable? How could the dependency tracker
determine what Boost.Config will define?