Subject: Re: [boost] Standalone boost::ignore_unused_variable_warning()
From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-05-19 13:39:56
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Antony Polukhin wrote:
>
> I'd prefer to see a single function name, not two:
>
> boost::ignore_unused_variables(v1) ;
> boost::ignore_unused_variables(v1, v2, v3);
>
[snip]
>
> boost::utility:: namespace looks reasonable. +1
>
It feels more like a workaround, than a utility, and so I would have
thought that:
a. The more natural home is Boost.Config
b. The macro approaches were preferable
I also like the idea of not adding new things to Boost.Utility going
forward (even if they only depend on Boost.Config).
Best,
Glen