Subject: Re: [boost] [Range] contains() for unsorted ranges?
From: Nathan Ridge (zeratul976_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-04-06 15:52:13


> Wouldn't the library be well served by providing a contains() algorithm > - with the same overloads/versions as find - for unsorted ranges? > Surely, having to test against the range's end ruins the otherwise > expressive syntax offered; especially when adaptors are involved and one > has to test against the adapted range's end. > Perhaps I am missing an obvious reason why not? I can't think of a reason. In my code I wrote my own version of this function and I use it all the time. If you're interested in contributing such a function to Boost.Range (including tests and documentation), I'd be happy to review it. Regards, Nate