Boost mailing page: Re: [boost] [type_traits] Should namespace boost::align be namespace boost::detail::align?

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [type_traits] Should namespace boost::align be namespace boost::detail::align?
From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-18 12:45:41

Next message: Adam Wulkiewicz: "Re: [boost] [move] [range] move algorithm (was: interest: the pass-by-value...)"
Previous message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [build] Headers rule does both too much and too little"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [type_traits] Should namespace boost::align be namespace boost::detail::align?"

On Tue, Feb 18, 2014, John Maddock wrote:
>
> Fixed in develop.
>

Thanks!

Next message: Adam Wulkiewicz: "Re: [boost] [move] [range] move algorithm (was: interest: the pass-by-value...)"
Previous message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [build] Headers rule does both too much and too little"
In reply to: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [type_traits] Should namespace boost::align be namespace boost::detail::align?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view