Subject: Re: [boost] [Config] Macros for the absence of a full C++11 <memory> implementation
From: Ahmed Charles (acharles_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-11 00:29:36
> From: lists_at_[hidden]
> To: boost_at_[hidden]
> Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2014 03:46:25 +0200
> Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost] [Config] Macros for the absence of a full C++11 <memory> implementation
>
> The above three macros, plus the additional BOOST_NO_CXX11_STD_ALIGN, would
> cover the whole C++11 <memory> except for the reachability functions (which
> nobody needs)... and std::addressof, which is pretty useful. Perhaps we need
> to add BOOST_NO_CXX11_ADDRESSOF while we're at it.
Boost has boost::addressof, which does the same thing as the standard one, so there probably isn't much reason to detect the standard one.