Subject: Re: [boost] SQL: next iteration of sqlpp11
From: Rodrigo Madera (rodrigo.madera_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-04 12:46:18
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Sebastian Theophil <stheophil_at_[hidden]
> wrote:
> using boost::optional is the canonical solution that is also impossible to
> misinterpret.
>
+1
This is the solution that the competing library SOCI uses [1].
Regards,
Rodrigo Madera
[1] http://soci.sourceforge.net/doc/3.2/boost.html