Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Fiber review January 6-15
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-23 12:04:32
On 23 Jan 2014 at 17:31, Oliver Kowalke wrote:
> > One point of mine not mentioned in the report is that I would really
> > like to see Boost Fibers graphed against Windows Fibers on that
> > performance scaling graph.
>
> it would be more correct to compare boost.context's fcontext with
> Windows Fibers than boost.fiber AFAIK Windows Fibers do not have a
> scheduler - ifyou want WinFibers scheduled you would have to write your
> own (as boost.fiber does)
I would like to see Boost Fibers, fcontext and Windows Fibers. Then
one can see if Boost Fibers introduces any unusual "kinks" in the
scaling.
Niall
-- Currently unemployed and looking for work in Ireland. Work Portfolio: http://careers.stackoverflow.com/nialldouglas/