Subject: Re: [boost] Is there a thin array wrapper/proxy lying around somewhere?
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-25 10:44:22
AMDG
On 11/25/2013 01:22 AM, Mostafa wrote:
>
> Because it does not meet the stated requirements. For one, it doesn't
> have operator+, two, it doesn't have the necessary implicit
> conversion-to-pointer operator, three regular arrays can't be assigned
> to, etc ...
>
> To be more clear, what is desired is a type that mimics all (well, I can
> live with almost all [1]) the functionality of a regular array, no more,
> no less.
>
> [1] Initialization with array initializor list might be impossible to do
> in C++03.
>
If you want something that behaves exactly like an
array, why can't you use an array?
In Christ,
Steven Watanabe