Subject: Re: [boost] Support for BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION
From: Stephen Kelly (steveire_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-10-10 04:21:27
On 10/10/2013 07:48 AM, Joaquin M Lopez Munoz wrote:
> Stephen Kelly <steveire <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> On 10/09/2013 12:39 AM, Joaquin M Lopez Munoz wrote:
>>> I understand there's been some discussion about dropping support for
>>> compliers with BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION defined. Has some
>>> final decision been made about this?
>> What is the question behind the question?
> Once the decision is taken, I can get rid of some workarounds in the Boost
> libs I maintain.
Indeed. I already have patches ready to push which remove the use of the
macro throughout boost.
Thanks,
Steve.