Subject: Re: [boost] Review request: Bumping borland, SunPro, mwerks and MPW compiler requirements
From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-09-27 07:48:40
On 27 September 2013 12:12, Stephen Kelly <steveire_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> So, if looks like requiring a minimum value for __BORLANDC__ of 0x610,
> as I have in the patch I posted, is reasonable, right?
No. Someone's still using an older version and I don't see any good
reason to stop them. The question is not, "why should we continue to
allow an old compiler?", it's "why shouldn't we?".