Subject: Re: [boost] Boost reviews
From: Thorsten Ottosen (thorsten.ottosen_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-09-19 12:49:23
On 19-09-2013 17:57, Niall Douglas wrote:
> On 18 Sep 2013 at 20:29, Edward Diener wrote:
>
>> As someone who still would like to see my variadic data library be
>> reviewed for possible acceptance into Boost I am most curious to know
>> the reasons why no new libraries appear to be getting reviewed anymore.
>
> Did you not see my post
> http://listarchives.boost.org/Archives/boost/2013/09/206187.php? I offered
> to review manage someone's library in exchange for that person review
> managing AFIO.
Maybe that's not the best discipline that two authors act as review
manager for eachother libraries.
just my two cent.
-Thorsten