Subject: Re: [boost] [thread] Dividing into Boost.Thread and Boost.Sync
From: Bjorn Reese (breese_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-19 07:53:35
On 08/18/2013 11:31 PM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> I think we can provide a minimal future abstraction that can be used
> with other execution contexts, but it would need to have as parameter
> the associated mutex and condition_variable abstraction, otherwise I
> don't see how we can do it. Maybe you have found how. If yes, I will be
> interested in knowing how?
It the most extreme case where no synchronization is needed, we have
Boost.Expected (once it is finalized.)