Subject: Re: [boost] Releasing Boost Dependency Analyzer 1.1
From: Daniel James (daniel_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-09 06:43:26
On Fri, 9 Aug 2013, at 12:20 PM, Jens Weller wrote:
>
> libraries.xml as a lib name source is nice, but not quite perfect. I've
> seen different results from maintainers.txt and libraries.xml.
> As maintainers.txt also libraries.xml contains duplicates, some of its
> library names don't fit the expectation of bcp, so I applied some fixes
> for this in my program.
If you filter by version there aren't any duplicates, they're there
because the details of libraries changes from version to version.