Boost mailing page: Re: [boost] Interest in an 'either' library?

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in an 'either' library?
From: Klaim - JoÃ«l Lamotte (mjklaim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-21 13:19:33

Next message: Eric Niebler: "Re: [boost] [result_of] Documentation update for ticket 7753"
Previous message: Nevin Liber: "Re: [boost] [Multiprecision] Does MP use references internally?"
In reply to: David Sankel: "[boost] Interest in an 'either' library?"
Next in thread: David Sankel: "Re: [boost] Interest in an 'either' library?"
Reply: David Sankel: "Re: [boost] Interest in an 'either' library?"

Hi,

it is not clear to me how it is "lightweight" compared to boost::variant,
can you clarify?

Joel Lamotte

Next message: Eric Niebler: "Re: [boost] [result_of] Documentation update for ticket 7753"
Previous message: Nevin Liber: "Re: [boost] [Multiprecision] Does MP use references internally?"
In reply to: David Sankel: "[boost] Interest in an 'either' library?"
Next in thread: David Sankel: "Re: [boost] Interest in an 'either' library?"
Reply: David Sankel: "Re: [boost] Interest in an 'either' library?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view