Subject: [boost] [test] enable_if, etc. : was : ...multiprecision types ... for unit tests?
From: Christopher Kormanyos (e_float_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-12 16:48:30

• Next message: Christopher Kormanyos: "Re: [boost] [Multiprecision] High-performance radix-2 floating-point back-end"
• Previous message: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] [thread] Use of synchronized_value<> member in a constructor"
• In reply to: Gennadiy Rozental: "Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numerictypes for unit tests?"
• Next in thread: Gennadiy Rozental: "Re: [boost] [test]enable_if, etc. : was : ...multiprecision types ... for unit tests?"
• Reply: Gennadiy Rozental: "Re: [boost] [test]enable_if, etc. : was : ...multiprecision types ... for unit tests?"

• Next message: Christopher Kormanyos: "Re: [boost] [Multiprecision] High-performance radix-2 floating-point back-end"
• Previous message: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] [thread] Use of synchronized_value<> member in a constructor"
• In reply to: Gennadiy Rozental: "Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numerictypes for unit tests?"
• Next in thread: Gennadiy Rozental: "Re: [boost] [test]enable_if, etc. : was : ...multiprecision types ... for unit tests?"
• Reply: Gennadiy Rozental: "Re: [boost] [test]enable_if, etc. : was : ...multiprecision types ... for unit tests?"