Subject: Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numeric types for unit tests?
From: Christopher Kormanyos (e_float_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-08 04:35:13

• Next message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numeric types for unit tests?"
• Previous message: Daryle Walker: "[boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numeric types for unit tests?"
• In reply to: Daryle Walker: "[boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numeric types for unit tests?"
• Next in thread: Christopher Kormanyos: "Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numeric types for unit tests?"
• Reply: Christopher Kormanyos: "Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numeric types for unit tests?"

• Next message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numeric types for unit tests?"
• Previous message: Daryle Walker: "[boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numeric types for unit tests?"
• In reply to: Daryle Walker: "[boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numeric types for unit tests?"
• Next in thread: Christopher Kormanyos: "Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numeric types for unit tests?"
• Reply: Christopher Kormanyos: "Re: [boost] [multiprecision] Are these types suitable as numeric types for unit tests?"