Subject: Re: [boost] [any] Divergence between Boost.Any and standard library proposal
From: Jonathan Wakely (jwakely.boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-05-07 04:18:00
On 6 May 2013 18:38, Gottlob Frege wrote:
>
>
> Isn't the rationale that the language defines all destructors are noexcept
> by default?
> (I recall that at least being discussed, I think it was accepted?)
Yes, see http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#1147
and http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2010/n3204.htm