Subject: Re: [boost] [config/multiprecision/units/general] Do we have a policy for user-defined-literals?
From: Christopher Kormanyos (e_float_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-04-28 04:18:09

• Next message: Daniel Frey: "[boost] [operators] What is the correct overload set for a binary operator?"
• Previous message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [config/multiprecision/units/general] Do we have a policy for user-defined-literals?"
• In reply to: John Maddock: "[boost] [config/multiprecision/units/general] Do we have a policy for user-defined-literals?"
• Next in thread: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [config/multiprecision/units/general] Do we have a policy for user-defined-literals?"
• Reply: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [config/multiprecision/units/general] Do we have a policy for user-defined-literals?"

• Next message: Daniel Frey: "[boost] [operators] What is the correct overload set for a binary operator?"
• Previous message: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [config/multiprecision/units/general] Do we have a policy for user-defined-literals?"
• In reply to: John Maddock: "[boost] [config/multiprecision/units/general] Do we have a policy for user-defined-literals?"
• Next in thread: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [config/multiprecision/units/general] Do we have a policy for user-defined-literals?"
• Reply: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [config/multiprecision/units/general] Do we have a policy for user-defined-literals?"