Subject: Re: [boost] [range] location of numeric algorithms
From: Nathan Ridge (zeratul976_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-04-18 01:48:16
> > Is there any reason the numeric algorithms in Boost.Range (accumulate(),
> > inner_product(), etc.) are located in boost/range/numeric.hpp rather
> > than in files named boost/range/algorithm/<algorithm-name>.hpp like
> > every other algorithm? I think it's confusing for users who expect
> > the uniform file naming convention that Boost.Range applies to other
> > algorithms, to apply to these ones too.
> >
>
> I do find it a little surprising that there's boost/range/algorithm/*.hpp,
> but only boost/range/numeric.hpp.
>
> I would be surprised to have a boost/range/algorithm/accumulate.hpp, but so
> long as numeric.hpp continues to exist, it's not such a bad thing.
>
> Would you envision boost/range/algorithm.hpp pulling in the numeric
> algorithms? I don't think the minor coupling implied is too bad, I'm just
> curious.
>
> I find the current numeric versus algorithm division as sensible as it is
> in the standard library -- and since I dealt with that for a long time
> before discovering boost.range, it didn't surprise me too much. Those
> coming at it a different way may feel differently, of course.
Ah, I didn't realize there was a similar distinction in the standard
library. It surprises me a little, particularly for accumulate() which
I view as a generic 'fold' operation, rather than something 'numeric'.
But it makes sense that Boost.Range follows the conventions of the
standard algorithms it wraps.
Regards,
Nate