Subject: Re: [boost] [log] Release candidate 1
From: Stefan Strasser (strasser_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-03-11 08:35:42
Am 11.03.2013 13:27, schrieb Stefan Strasser:
> Am 11.03.2013 12:51, schrieb Andrey Semashev:
>>> then it's an implemention detail, I'd suggest making all the
>>> functions of
>>> logging::core static, or make logging::core a namespace.
>>> if you wanna add the feature you've mentioned later on, you could for
>>> example ask the user to construct and hold a
>>> core::log_during_termination
>>> object, which - again as an implementation detail - holds a
>>> shared_ptr to
>>> the internal core.
>>
>> This won't work because every static function would have to obtain the
>> pointer to the core which may be invalidated because its global
>> destructor has been invoked already.
>
>
> I'm not suggesting any changes to the internals, only to the interface.
> Maybe the following code makes it a little clearer:
was your point that the destructor A::~A in my code can't use the static
functions? that's correct, but it can't use the current "static
core::get()" either. log_during_termination can provide an interface for
this corner case.