Boost mailing page: [boost] [type traits] is_literal_type ?

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: [boost] [type traits] is_literal_type ?
From: Robert Ramey (ramey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-02-27 14:26:06

Next message: Christophe Henry: "Re: [boost] [type_erasure] overloading macro"
Previous message: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] [type_erasure] overloading macro"
Next in thread: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [type traits] is_literal_type ?"
Reply: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [type traits] is_literal_type ?"

Any chance of a boost implementation for is_literal_type?

Robert Ramey

Next message: Christophe Henry: "Re: [boost] [type_erasure] overloading macro"
Previous message: Steven Watanabe: "Re: [boost] [type_erasure] overloading macro"
Next in thread: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [type traits] is_literal_type ?"
Reply: John Maddock: "Re: [boost] [type traits] is_literal_type ?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view