Subject: Re: [boost] *BSD detail/endian.hpp header patch looking for review
From: Brad Smith (brad_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-02-17 12:47:41


On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 06:36:21PM +0100, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> Le 17/02/13 18:16, Brad Smith a ?crit :
> >On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 05:54:29PM +0100, Lars Viklund wrote:
> >>On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:39:36AM -0500, Brad Smith wrote:
> >>>On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 05:33:10PM +0100, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> >>>>Le 17/02/13 15:53, Brad Smith a ?crit :
> >>>>>On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 01:31:50PM +0100, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:
> >>>>>>Le 16/02/13 20:57, Brad Smith a ?crit :
> >>>>>>>Hi,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>There is a patch for the detail/endian.hpp header for *BSD OS's
> >>>>>>>in ticket 6013 that needs review and to be commited. Anyone able
> >>>>>>>to help out here?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>Which Boost library (component) are you using that needs this patch?
> >>>>>This was already answered in the ticket.
> >>>>>
> >>>>I've requested here again, as I don't find the answer in the ticket.
> >>>"The same code that uses this header in the first place."
> >>Would you please stop channeling Theo and instead just answer with
> >>clarifications? While this might be acceptable behaviour in whatever
> >>organization you work in, it's not acceptable here. Be nice and helpful.
> >>
> >>Annoying contributors won't help getting them to go out of their way to
> >>aid in getting patches integrated.
> >$ find . -exec grep "boost/detail/endian.hpp" {} \; -print
> >#include <boost/detail/endian.hpp>
> >./boost/archive/impl/basic_binary_iarchive.ipp
> >#include <boost/detail/endian.hpp>
> >./boost/detail/limits.hpp
> >#include <boost/detail/endian.hpp>
> >./boost/math/special_functions/detail/fp_traits.hpp
> >#include <boost/detail/endian.hpp>
> >./boost/mpl/string.hpp
> >#include <boost/detail/endian.hpp>
> >./boost/spirit/home/support/detail/endian/endian.hpp
> >#include <boost/detail/endian.hpp>
> >./boost/spirit/home/support/detail/math/detail/fp_traits.hpp
> >#include <boost/detail/endian.hpp>
> >./libs/math/example/inspect_fp.cpp
> >
> The question intention was to assign it to the library you are using
> so that the ticket is taken by the author using this internal
> library. I you left it associated to the None component, None will
> take care of it.

I would have assigned the field as appropriate if I knew what to
set it to. I don't know so I can't answer that question now that
I know what it was you were trying to ask.

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.