Subject: Re: [boost] [smart_ptr] error with nullptr_t
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-12-11 21:31:03
John Bytheway wrote:
> I believe std::nullptr_t could be replaced with decltype(nullptr), which
> would allow this support to be offered without standard library
> assistance.
Your belief is correct, but I deliberately didn't mention this option for
aesthetic reasons. :-)
If we're going to support this configuration, I think that the sensible
thing to do would be for Boost.Config to define std::nullptr_t, std::move,
std::forward, and whatever else is missing and necessary. However... I'm not
sure that Boost.Config would be able to detect it.