Subject: Re: [boost] [type_traits] is_complete<T> possible realization
From: Matt Calabrese (rivorus_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-11-09 13:59:53
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Peter Dimov <lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> It's not contrived at all. It's the primary (and only) use case for
> is_complete.
>
Ha, yeah, true.
-- -Matt Calabrese