Subject: Re: [boost] [test] BOOST_TEST - universal testing tool
From: Gennadiy Rozenal (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-11-06 10:30:44
Rhys Ulerich <rhys.ulerich <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> > What about interface like this:
> >
> > BOOST_TEST_DECORATORS(
> > + decorator::tolerance(1e-6)
> > )
> > BOOST_AUTO_TEST_CASE( foo )
> > {
> > BOOST_TEST( foo == 1.5 );
> > }
>
> This just feels like a fixture-- any reason a regular ol' per-suite or
> per-test fixture providing a "default_tolerance" member wouldn't
> suffice?
It is (and it can be implemented like one), but if this is common need why not
make cleaner interface for it?
Gennadiy