Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Test updates in trunk: need for (mini) review?
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-11-04 04:34:34
On 4 November 2012 09:19, Gennadiy Rozenal <rogeeff_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Vicente J. Botet Escriba <vicente.botet <at> wanadoo.fr> writes:
>
>> I don't think that there should be conflicts but I wanted just to report
>> that boost/detail/lightweight_test.hpp defines
>>
>> #define BOOST_TEST(expr) ((expr)? (void)0:
>
> No one is expected to include both Boost.Test and other unit testing variants in
> the test file.
Boost.Test and lightweight_test both define BOOST_ERROR so they're
already incompatible.