Subject: Re: [boost] make_shared_array
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-11-02 10:35:56
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Rhys Ulerich <rhys.ulerich_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> There is shared_range, an iterator_range subclass with shared
>>> ownership semantics, that we put together awhile ago:
>>> https://github.com/RhysU/shared_range
>
>> But it's not in Boost. Any plans to propose it?
>
> Think it's worth proposing as a Boost.Range utility class?
I'd propose it as shared_array2. :p
I think the functionality is more important than the name though and
I'd definitely like to see functionality like that in Boost.
-- Olaf