Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Test updates in trunk: need for (mini) review?
From: Gennadiy Rozental (rogeeff_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-10-29 14:00:44
Dave Abrahams <dave <at> boostpro.com> writes:
> What I always wanted was something that would automatically run all the
> tests that failed first and schedule all the tests that succeeded last,
> after any that didn't run at all. Obviously that requires keeping some
> state around between runs.
With a little effort of maintaining the state somewhere we can add 2 command
line arguments:
test.exe --save_state=<location>
test.exe --run=@failing
test.exe --run=!@failing
Second is an existing command line argument, but we'll need to add handling to
"special" label.
Gennadiy