Subject: Re: [boost] [thread] terminating destructor
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-10-25 04:03:40
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Andrzej Krzemienski <akrzemi1_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> The third situation below shows a non blocking ~future. But such execution
> is *disallowed *by the standard because the completion of launched thread
> would not synchronize with the last release of the shared state.
The big question is: why?
Can't the destructor detach from the shared state and let the state be
cleaned up by the launched thread?
Olaf