Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Test updates in trunk: need for (mini) review?
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-10-22 18:23:41
Le 22/10/12 22:20, Daniel James a écrit :
> On 22 October 2012 20:54, Vicente J. Botet Escriba
> <vicente.botet_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I disagree. Using BOOST_TEST_ as prefix even if longer make the code
>> clearest. This is one of the Boost rules and any Boost library should follow
>> them.
> It isn't, the rule is:
>
>> Macro (gasp!) names all uppercase and begin with BOOST_.
> That's from http://www.boost.org/development/requirements.html
>
>
You are right, but how we can ensure that two independent Boost
libraries don't deliver the same macro?
Vicente