Subject: Re: [boost] Boost.Test updates in trunk: need for (mini) review?
From: Evgeny Panasyuk (evgeny.panasyuk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-10-20 05:26:19
Hello,
20.10.2012 13:09, Gennadiy Rozenal wrote:
>> BTW,
>>
>> could you tell us which features are exclusive of a c++11 compliant
>> compiler?
> Data driven test case 100% c++11. BOOST_CHECKA only some advanced variations.
"data driven test case" subsystem looks like a good feature, but why
restricting to C++11? Which kind of features from C++11 are required?
Variadic macro for BOOST_DATA_TEST_CASE?
Best Regards,
Evgeny