Subject: Re: [boost] [coroutine] Experimenting with interfaces
From: Eugene Yakubovich (eyakubovich_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-09-21 14:15:46
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Oliver Kowalke <oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> thank you for your examples:
> If coroutine's template signature returns a type different from void it is
> required that the coroutine function does return the same type instead of
> void as in your example.
I understand but what I was doing is exploring interfaces that were
most natural to the problem I was trying to solve. And it seems that
having a coroutine function return void (even if coro signature's
return value is non-void) is useful. Also, Giovanni's proposed
interface essentially has a void return type.
>
>
> template <typename C>
> void timer(C c, chrono::seconds interval) {
> // while( interval != chrono::seconds::zero() ) {
> // this_thread::sleep_for(interval);
> // interval = c(interval);
> // }
>
> }
>
> coroutine<chrono::seconds(chrono::seconds)> c(
> [](coroutine<chrono::seconds(chrono::seconds)> c, chrono::seconds i) {
> timer(c, i);
> }
> );
>
> chrono::seconds s = c(chrono::seconds(1));
>
>
> Which value has variable 's' after return from 'c(chrono::seconds(1))' ?
chrono::seconds(1) since timer() yields whatever was initially passed
in and then whatever was returned by c().
Regards,
Eugene