Subject: Re: [boost] [rational] optional over/underflow checking
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-09-17 03:40:52
> BTW, are there any status updates on the unlimited precision
> numeric class effort?
I'm slowly working through the review comments. I think I have most of the
changes to the front end interface done (including the much requested mixed
precision arithmetic), backend breaking interface changes next (mostly to
cpp_int).
John.