Subject: Re: [boost] C++11 decltype/SFINAE puzzler
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-08-13 03:46:48
> Right. It can be easily turned into a compile-time error by
> static_assert'ing that the function's return type is not sfinae_error,
> but the compiler error wouldn't be informative. You'd have to run to
> code to see the error.
>
> I was hoping to have a way to transport the error to an API boundary and
> reporting it there, instead of presenting users with an imposing
> template instantiation backtrace, but that might not be possible.
I haven't followed this discussion, but you can move static_assert's up the
call stack by moving the condition into an enable/disable_if, then the
compiler simply doesn't find the function and you get the error "sooner".
But you've probably considered all this already yours, John.